What Is Commission?
A commission is a payment made to an individual or entity for services rendered, typically calculated as a percentage of the value of a transaction or a fixed fee per unit. Within the realm of financial services compensation, commissions are a common method by which brokerage firms, agents, or financial professionals are compensated for facilitating the buying and selling of securities or other financial products. This payment structure directly ties the compensation of the intermediary to the volume or value of the transactions they execute or the products they sell.
History and Origin
The practice of charging commissions in financial markets has a long history, dating back to the formation of early stock exchanges. For centuries, and notably in the United States, brokerages operated under a fixed commission system where the fees for executing trades were standardized and non-negotiable. This tradition was enshrined in agreements such as the 1792 Buttonwood Agreement, which led to the precursor of the New York Stock Exchange. Under this system, all brokers charged the same predetermined fee for each transaction, regardless of size or complexity, ensuring a predictable income stream for firms24.
A pivotal moment in the history of commissions occurred on May 1, 1975, a date widely known as "May Day" on Wall Street. On this day, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) mandated the abolition of fixed commission rates on stock exchanges, moving instead to a system of competitive, negotiated rates23,22. This deregulation was aimed at increasing competition among brokers and reducing trading costs for investors. The shift led to the rise of discount brokerages and a gradual decline in commission rates over the ensuing decades, ultimately culminating in widespread "zero-commission" trading for stocks and exchange-traded funds (ETFs) by major brokerage firms in recent years21.
Key Takeaways
- Commissions are payments to intermediaries, often based on a percentage of a transaction's value or a fixed amount per unit.
- In finance, commissions compensate brokers and agents for facilitating trades or selling financial products.
- Historically, brokerage commissions were fixed, but deregulation in 1975 led to competitive rates and eventually widespread zero-commission trading for many asset classes.
- While some services now appear "commission-free," financial firms generate revenue through other means, such as payment for order flow and interest on cash balances.
- Commission-based compensation can introduce potential conflicts of interest between the financial professional and the client.
Interpreting the Commission
Understanding how commissions are applied is crucial for investors and consumers of financial services. When evaluating an investment product or service, the presence and structure of commissions directly impact the total cost of investing and can influence the advice or recommendations received.
For instance, a higher commission on a particular mutual fund might incentivize a broker-dealer to recommend that fund over another with lower or no commission, even if the latter is more suitable for the investor's goals. Similarly, in fields like insurance, agents often earn commissions on policies sold, which can create a bias towards higher-premium products. Transparent disclosure of commission structures is therefore vital, enabling individuals to make informed decisions about their investments and financial arrangements20.
Hypothetical Example
Consider an investor, Maria, who wants to purchase 100 shares of Company X stock, currently trading at $50 per share.
-
Traditional Commission Scenario: If Maria uses a traditional brokerage firm that charges a fixed commission of $9.95 per trade, her total cost for the transaction would be the share price multiplied by the number of shares, plus the commission:
- Stock Cost: 100 shares * $50/share = $5,000
- Commission: $9.95
- Total Outflow: $5,000 + $9.95 = $5,009.95
-
Percentage-Based Commission Scenario: If Maria were to invest in a different product, such as a managed portfolio, where the financial professional receives a 1% commission on the transaction value:
- Investment Value: $5,000
- Commission: 1% of $5,000 = $50
- Total Outflow: $5,000 + $50 = $5,050
This example illustrates how commission structures directly impact the overall cost of a transaction, a key factor in assessing investment performance.
Practical Applications
Commissions manifest in various areas of the financial landscape:
- Brokerage Trading: Traditionally, brokers earned commissions for executing trades on a stock exchange. While many online brokers now offer "zero-commission" trades for stocks and Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs), they generate revenue through other means, such as interest on uninvested cash, margin trading interest, and selling customer order flow to market makers19,18.
- Mutual Funds and Annuities: Sales of mutual funds and annuities often involve commissions paid to the selling agent or broker. These can be front-end loads (paid at the time of purchase), back-end loads (paid upon redemption), or trail commissions (ongoing payments from the fund's assets)17.
- Insurance Products: Insurance agents typically earn commissions on the premiums of policies they sell, including life insurance, health insurance, and property and casualty insurance16.
- Real Estate: Real estate agents earn a commission, usually a percentage of the property's sale price, upon the successful closing of a real estate transaction.
- Financial Planning: Some financial planners may be compensated through commissions on the investment products they recommend or sell. Others operate on a fee-only basis, charging clients a fixed fee, an hourly rate, or a percentage of assets under management, thus avoiding commission-based conflicts15. New regulations, such as the Consolidated Appropriations Act, require brokers and consultants to disclose anticipated compensation, including commissions, for certain group health plans14.
Limitations and Criticisms
While commissions serve as a form of compensation, they are often a point of contention due to potential conflicts of interest. A primary criticism is that commission-based compensation can incentivize financial professionals to recommend products or engage in transactions that generate the highest commission for them, rather than those that are most aligned with the client's best interests13,12. This can lead to "churning" (excessive trading to generate commissions) or the recommendation of unsuitable products11.
For example, a financial advisor compensated by commission might push a higher-cost mutual fund even if a lower-cost, equivalent alternative exists that would be more beneficial to the client's long-term returns. Regulatory bodies, such as the SEC, emphasize the importance of disclosure to help mitigate these conflicts, requiring financial firms to communicate how their representatives are compensated10,9. However, some argue that mere disclosure may not be sufficient to fully eliminate the subtle influence of these conflicts on advice8. Concerns about "lucrative fees" and suitability have prompted firms like UBS to scale back sales of complex, commission-generating products following client losses7.
Commission vs. Fee
The terms "commission" and "fee" are often used interchangeably in finance, but they refer to distinct compensation structures.
A commission is specifically a payment tied directly to a transaction or the sale of a product, typically calculated as a percentage of the transaction value. The payment is contingent upon the execution of a trade or the completion of a sale. For instance, a broker earns a commission when a client buys or sells shares of a stock6.
A fee, in a financial context, is a broader term referring to a charge for services rendered that may or may not be directly tied to a specific transaction. Fees can be structured in various ways, such as an annual percentage of assets under management (AUM), an hourly rate for financial planning advice, or a flat charge for account maintenance. Investment advisors often charge fees based on AUM, meaning their compensation grows as the client's portfolio grows, theoretically aligning their interests with the client's long-term success5.
The key distinction lies in the direct link to a sales transaction versus a more general charge for ongoing advice or services. Both methods represent costs to the investor, but their impact on potential conflicts of interest and the nature of the client-professional relationship can differ significantly.
FAQs
1. What is a "zero-commission" trade?
A "zero-commission" trade means that the brokerage firm does not charge a direct fee to the investor for buying or selling a security, such as a stock or Exchange-Traded Fund (ETF). However, this does not mean the trade is entirely free for the brokerage. These firms often generate revenue through other avenues, such as receiving payment for order flow from market makers, earning interest on uninvested cash balances, or charging for premium services4,3.
2. How do commissions affect my investment returns?
Commissions directly reduce your net investment returns because they are costs associated with buying or selling. For example, if you buy shares and pay a commission, your initial investment is immediately reduced by that amount. When you sell, another commission reduces your proceeds. Over time, frequent trading with commissions can significantly erode overall returns, especially for smaller portfolios2.
3. Are all financial professionals paid by commission?
No, not all financial professionals are paid by commission. Some, particularly investment advisors who operate under a fiduciary duty, charge fees based on a percentage of the assets they manage (assets under management, or AUM), hourly rates, or flat fees for financial planning. Others, such as traditional brokers, may still earn commissions on transactions. It's important to understand a financial professional's compensation structure, which should be disclosed to you1.